There are two ways to use AI for a WordPress site. You can write somewhere else and paste the result in, or the generation can happen inside WordPress and produce a post directly. This article is about the second, what changes when you do it that way, and where it goes wrong.<\/p>\n
Not convenience. Context. A tool running inside your site can read your categories, your existing posts, your internal links and your own past writing. A chat window in another tab knows none of that, which is why its output always needs the most editing.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
The most useful thing a generator can do is not write new prose. It is notice that you covered this in March, and either link to it or decline to write the same article twice. That requires querying your posts, which requires being in your database.<\/p>\n
It lands in A model asked to add internal links from outside your site will invent plausible URLs. Inside, the candidates come from an actual query against published posts, so a link either exists or is not offered. This is the difference between an internal linking feature and a broken-link generator.<\/p>\n “Generate an article” sounds like one API call. Done properly it is several, each doing a different job, and knowing the shape helps you understand both the cost and where quality comes from.<\/p>\nwp_posts<\/code> with a status, an author, categories and a featured image. Your editor works on it. Your SEO plugin sees it. Your revision history covers it. Nothing has to be migrated later because it was never anywhere else.<\/p>\nInternal links can be real<\/h3>\n
What a generation run actually involves<\/h2>\n